60 minutes ago: BREAKING — The U.S. Supreme Court, through its Public Information Office, just issued a rare public statement that’s rocking W@sh!ngt0n. The Court says D0n@ld Tr@mp’s military action in V@nezuel@ and the arrest of M@dur0 were carried out without Congressional approval, violating Article I, Section 8 and the War Powers Acts. Sources say the move is being labeled illegal and impeachable, with a swift investigation now ordered. READ MORE :

Washington was jolted less than an hour ago after the Supreme Court of the United States, through its rarely heard-from Public Information Office, issued an extraordinary public statement now reverberating across the political and legal landscape.

According to the statement, military actions ordered by former President Donald Trump in Venezuela—including the arrest of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro—were carried out without congressional authorization, placing them in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution and federal law.

Constitutional Lines Allegedly Crossed
The Court’s statement cites Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants United States Congress the sole authority to declare war, as well as the War Powers Resolution, designed to limit unilateral military action by the executive branch.

Legal experts say the language used by the Court is unusually direct and signals deep concern over the scope of presidential power exercised without legislative consent.

“This is not procedural criticism,” said one constitutional scholar. “This is a statement that goes to the heart of separation of powers.”

Labeled “Illegal and Impeachable”
Sources familiar with internal discussions say the actions described in the statement are now being characterized as illegal and potentially impeachable, a term rarely invoked in connection with Supreme Court communications.

While the Court itself does not initiate impeachment proceedings, its interpretation of constitutional violations could carry immense weight as lawmakers consider next steps

Within minutes of the statement’s release, senior members of Congress reportedly began discussing a swift investigative response, focusing on decision-making authority, command orders, and the legal justification—if any—used to bypass congressional approval.

A Rare Move by the Court
Historically, the Supreme Court avoids public commentary outside formal opinions. The decision to issue a public statement via its information office underscores the gravity of the situation and the potential constitutional crisis implied by the allegations.

Former court officials describe the move as “extraordinary,” noting that it suggests urgency and concern about public understanding of constitutional boundaries.

Political Shockwaves Across Washington
Reaction in Washington has been immediate and intense. Lawmakers from both parties are calling for briefings, document preservation, and testimony from defense and intelligence officials. Political analysts say the statement could redefine ongoing debates over executive power, military authority, and accountability at the highest levels of government.

Trump allies are expected to challenge the characterization aggressively, arguing that national security concerns justified decisive action. Critics, however, say the Supreme Court’s statement undercuts that defense by emphasizing the absence of congressional consent.

What Happens Next?
Attention is now turning to investigative committees, potential court challenges, and the broader constitutional implications. If formal inquiries confirm the Court’s concerns, the episode could become one of the most consequential clashes between branches of government in modern U.S. history.

For now, one fact is undeniable: a rare Supreme Court statement has shaken Washington, reopened the debate over war powers, and placed presidential authority under an intense constitutional spotlight.